Joint replacements are the #1 expenditure of Medicare. The process of approving these medical devices is flawed according to the Institute of Medicine. It is time for patients' voices to be heard as stakeholders and for public support for increased medical device industry accountability and heightened protections for patients. Post-market registry. Product warranty. Patient/consumer stakeholder equity. Rescind industry pre-emptions/entitlements. All clinical trials must report all data.
Please share what you have learned!
Twitter: @JjrkCh
Showing posts with label knee replacement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label knee replacement. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

ProPublica consumer-accessible Surgeon Scorecard for hip & knee surgeons!



We Go Behind the Scenes on Surgeon Scorecard

ProPublica, July 20, 2015
Last week, ProPublica launched Surgeon Scorecard, our new database showcasing the complication rates of nearly 17,000 surgeons nationwide. For the first time, patients can now weigh surgeons’ past performance before going under the knife and doctors themselves can see where they stand relative to their peers.
Our Surgeon Scorecard team – Marshall Allen, Olga Pierce and Sisi Wei – joined ProPublica’s Eric Umansky on the podcast to discuss how they tackled this ambitious, all-hands-on-deck project.
Highlights from their conversation:

  • The lack of incentive for hospitals to track their own surgeons’ complication rates. It’s difficult to do and also very uncomfortable politically, Allen says. Surgeons are powerful, they bring in a lot of revenue to the institution, and there’s the risk that they’ll take their cases to another hospital. (7:38)
  • What makes a compelling data story: “If there are relentless numbers in a story, it's often a sign that your data is not as strong as you think it is,” Pierce says. “The best data stories are ones where you've reached some sort of interesting finding and that is a launching plane for the rest of the story.” (21:15)
  • How all ProPublica apps, including Surgeon Scorecard, have “a near view and a far view,” offering not only a look at broader trends but specific data on specific localities that journalists can use to power their reporting. “There are going to be so many local stories that we can't focus on,” Wei says. “But other journalists can use our app to do that.” (25:06)http://www.propublica.org/podcast/item/we-go-behind-the-scenes-on-surgeon-scorecard/?utm_source=et&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dailynewsletter&utm_content=&utm_name=




You can listen to this podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud or Stitcher, and use our Surgeon Scorecard app to look up your doctor.

Monday, July 20, 2015

Patients and surgeons select implants blind to effectiveness, safety and cost.



DMN reporter got his knees replaced — but was the stiff price a good deal?

By JIM LANDERS 
Staff Writer
16 July 2015 

Getting your knees replaced can be an education in much of what’s wrong with health care — as I learned last year from personal experience.
My insurer offered guidance on which hospitals were in network, and how much they’d be reimbursed. My doctor referred me to a surgery group that practiced at only one of those hospitals.
I didn’t know which companies make artificial knee joints, or which ones are best.
Luckily, I came out of it with mechanical knees that greatly improve my quality of life. I remember the times I couldn’t run across the street before the light turned red because running meant bone-on-bone pain. I remember the photos my wife took where I was as bow-legged as a cowboy cliche — my knee cartilage was so far gone.
But the choices I made with limited information about surgeons, hospitals and medical devices probably wound up hitting my employer, The Dallas Morning News, with $10,000 in extra insurance charges.
It was a surprise, though, when one of the nation’s top orthopedic surgeons told me he is almost equally in the dark as he tries to determine where to go to replace one of his own knees.
“There should be a process where I can seek information about quality, outcomes and cost,” said Dr. Kevin Bozic, chairman of surgery at the University of Texas at Austin’s Dell Medical Center. “If you’re in D.C. or Dallas and you’re trying to figure out where you can get that, it’s a joke.”
Market peculiarities
Bozic recently came to Austin from San Francisco, where he was part of an orthopedic surgical team and was on the faculty of the University of California at San Francisco. He has a master’s degree in business administration to go along with his medical credentials.
He’s studied and written about the peculiarities of the joint replacement market for several years.
“If you look this up online,” he said, “you’re going to get a bunch of advertisements saying this one uses robots, or this one has the latest technology, and then you’ll find information on Yelp about the surgeon’s bedside manner, and that’s important.
“But the things you really care about — will it improve my health, reduce my pain, will I have a quality outcome — you’re going to find nothing.
“That needs to change,” Bozic said. “The consumer wants the best outcome at the lowest cost.”
He hopes a more rational way of doing business is on the horizon.

The hope, which is beginning to emerge in Dallas and elsewhere, is that medical devices will have a searchable track record of success — or failure.
It’s a hope that consumers can learn which hospitals and surgeons do the best work — and which surgeons are paid huge sums by the device makers. It’s a hope that patients will be out of bed and able to start physical therapy within a day of surgery, rather than two or three or even four days later.
And it’s a hope that insurers will someday pay one bundled price for joint replacements — and hospitals, surgeons, anesthesiologists, physical therapists and medical device makers will have to work within that budget.
Some device manufacturers are taking cost out of their products. Prices have fallen between 8 percent and 13 percent over the last year for key knee and hip replacement components.

The 4-year-old American Joint Replacement Registry (Bozic is its vice chairman) has data on nearly 300,000 joint replacements. The group is watching to see how long the replacements last, which surgery techniques and technologies work best, and which ones don’t.
This month, Medicare announced a bundled payment initiative for joint replacements. And for two years, it has released data on medical device and pharmaceutical company payments to physicians and hospitals.
The big remaining question is: Value for whom? The consumer, or the hospital? In Dallas, at least, the hospitals are the ones coming out ahead.
Oblivious to cost
The way it’s worked until now is pretty strange.
Most orthopedic surgeons are oblivious to the cost of medical devices. They choose what they’ll use based on a buddy system with a sales representative. Many surgeons get consulting fees or design royalties from those device makers.
Hospitals that want the surgeon’s business buy the joint replacements the surgeon wants. They are contractually forbidden from telling the surgeons or anyone else what price they pay. The hospitals bill patients for the device (often including a big, hidden markup), for the operating room and for their care during a typical two-night stay.
“In most places, physicians are not employees of hospitals and don’t care what things cost, and that shifts a lot of power to the manufacturers,” said Pete Allen, executive vice president for sales and marketing with Novation, an Irving-based company that buys supplies for more than 1,500 hospitals across the country.
The sales reps stick with their surgeons. They go to all the surgeon’s operations with suitcases full of tools and parts for artificial joints. They use laser pointers to tell nurses and other members of the operating team what to use.

Sometimes they upsell, Allen said, recommending a new component to the surgeon while the patient is on the operating table.
When a patient has multiple fractures, the operating room can get crowded. “A trauma case may have four or five reps in the operating room,” Allen said. “That’s a lot of expense, and it’s not free.”

Artificial knees are made of cobalt, stainless steel or titanium that covers the ends of the thigh and shin bones. A hard plastic disc absorbs the friction between the metal pieces. A sliding button on the back of the knee cap keeps it moving.
Hips are made from similar materials and ceramics, with a long stem embedded in the femur and a ball-and-socket placed into the pelvis.
Hospitals pay anywhere from $3,300 to nearly $11,000 for the parts in one standard artificial hip or knee, according to the ECRI Institute, a Pennsylvania group that tracks medical supply pricing for hospitals.
U.S. surgeons are expected to replace more than 1.3 million hips and knees this year. By 2020, the number is expected to hit 2 million, with 3 million by 2030.
In 2012, Truven Health Analytics determined that medical devices were the single-biggest driver of hospital inflation between 2001 and 2006.
Medical device prices doubled between 1997 and 2008, and the number of joint replacements grew even faster. Hospitals complained that they were getting squeezed between what Medicare was prepared to reimburse and what device makers were demanding as payment.
A bill was unsuccessfully introduced in Congress to compel device manufacturers to reveal their selling prices.
The gross margins on joint replacement sales are as much as three times greater than the costs of manufacturing. Relatively little of those margins are invested in research and development. Most of it goes back to the sales reps, who account for 40 percent to 45 percent of the price of a joint replacement.
Steve Lichtenthal, vice president of business development with the Orthopaedic Implant Company of Reno, Nev., argues those margins are too big.
“Thirty-five years ago, orthopedic implant sales operated like any other industry. The sales rep would come around every so often with lunch for the staff and to shake the doctor’s hand,” he said. “Then every few years there’d be new technology; anatomically shaped plates, different screws, or a different material used in spacers for a vertebral fusion case, for a few examples. Hospitals couldn’t keep up with the changes, and the industry did a wonderful job embedding their sales reps to manage the entire implant supply chain for the hospital while upselling physicians in the operating room while attending surgical cases.”
“It’s going to be very, very tough to undo that,” he said. “But if you eliminate that sales rep and modify the supply chain, you halve your implant costs. The magnitude of savings is into the billions.

Lichtenthal’s company is just getting started, and specializes in trauma plates rather than joint replacements. But another device maker is experimenting with a lower-cost, “rep-less” approach.
Smith & Nephew, Britain’s largest joint replacement maker and one of the top four sellers in the U.S. market, recently launched a line of hips and knees called Syncera using last year’s components, training software — and no sales reps. The company hasn’t said how well it’s doing, but promises more information later this month.
Other device makers are watching but haven’t followed.
David Floyd, group president for orthopedics with Michigan-based Stryker Corp., was asked by analysts in May what impact Syncera was having on his firm. “None,” he replied.

Bob Marshall, a vice president with Indiana-based Zimmer Holdings, told another group that the competition was healthy.
“If we can’t prove out the value for the premium technology, those prices won’t be held,” he said. But he warned that value-based joint implants could be costly for hospitals if they lead to liability problems.
And yet, the pricing of joint replacements has dropped.
Tim Browne, ECRI Institute’s price guide director, said prices for a key knee component are down 8.3 percent from a year ago. With hips, the key component price has fallen 13.4 percent.
“Of late, hospitals have really gotten engaged with physicians, working collectively, to drive that down,” Browne said.
Some insurers are also pushing back. CalPERS, the California state employee retirement system, notified members in 2011 that their health insurance would cover a hospital’s knee replacement charges up to $30,000.
If the procedure cost more, the consumer would pay the difference.
In response, California hospitals left out by CalPERS’ reference price lowered their prices by 38 percent — from an average of $43,308 to $28,465.
The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association reported in January that joint replacement charges can double or even triple among hospitals within the same metro area. Between 2011 and 2013, hospitals in Dallas got as little as $16,772 and as much as $69,654 for a knee replacement.
The current average knee replacement reimbursement in Dallas, according to insurance claims sifted by the Health Care Cost Institute, is $45,436. The national average is $33,560.
Dallas hospital administrators say they’re squeezed by low Medicare reimbursements and have to recover by charging more to insured patients.
Big markups
Whether needed or not, the markups are big.
Baylor Scott & White Health System hospitals in the Dallas area performed almost 2,400 hip and knee replacements last year. The hospital chain’s supply managers and surgeons meet to discuss which devices to use. They try to limit the number of suppliers as much as they can to drive a better bargain.
A similar approach with cardiologists led to savings of between 18 percent and 20 percent on $40 million worth of stents, pacemakers and other heart surgery devices, said Pam Bryant, Baylor’s supply manager.
Bryant said the hospital chain spends about $30 million a year on knee and hip replacements. She said she pays between $3,800 and $6,900 each for artificial knees.
Insurers and patients never see those bills. Instead, their line-item hospital bills include component pricing that covers both the negotiated device price and the hospital’s markup.
David Toomey, a health care consultant with Dallas-based Compass Professional Health Services, said area insurers are paying between $7,860 and $12,800 for knee replacement components — almost twice as much as the average cost of the device.
Asked about these markups, Baylor responded with this statement: “Our charges for devices utilize a markup on the raw cost of the device, which is in line with industry standards. Baylor Scott & White Health engages a third party to conduct an annual review of our device markup formula, which is proprietary, to ensure its reasonableness and alignment with device pricing by other leading health care providers.
“Baylor is reimbursed less than 100 percent of the actual cost of treating more than half of its patients, as roughly 60 percent of the patient base we serve is uninsured or underinsured.”
My knees
For my knees, my surgeon chose standard components made by DePuy Synthes, an Indiana firm owned by health care conglomerate Johnson & Johnson.j
So far, they’re working fine. The pain is gone. I can stand a little taller these days.
The hospital where I had them replaced charged $16,097.05 for each artificial knee. My insurance paid $10,982.72 each.
When I studied the bill, I thought it meant my surgeon had used some fancier components that provide the knees with rotation.
Not so. They’re fixed, standard knees.
ECRI Institute’s Tim Browne says the current average price paid by U.S. hospitals for the components of a standard knee replacement last year (when I had my surgery) was $5,081 — half the price paid by my health insurance.

“It’s a very inefficient marketplace,” UT’s Bozic said. “Even [for] me, an orthopedic surgeon who needs a knee replaced — I have no information on value.”

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

OOOPS! Study: One third of all total knee replacements are 'inappropriate'.



Monday 30 June 2014 - 12am PST
One third of total knee replacements in the US are "inappropriate" when applied to a Spanish patient classification system, according to a study published in Arthritis & Rheumatology, a journal of the American College of Rheumatology.
Figures from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality show that more than 600,000 knee replacements are performed each year in the US. This surgery has become increasingly more common over the past 15 years, with studies showing a 162% annual volume increase in Medicare-covered knee replacement surgeries during 1991-2010.
Experts are divided on the reasons for this growth, with some maintaining it demonstrates that the procedure is effective, while others argue the surgery is being overused. One concern of the critics who believe total knee arthroplasties (TKA) are being overused is that the procedure "is highly reliant on subjective criteria."
For the new study, researchers from Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond examined the criteria that is used to determine appropriateness for TKA.
The authors point out that the investigated criteria have not been studied in the US and have been developed in other countries.
"To my knowledge, ours is the first US study to compare validated appropriateness criteria with actual cases of knee replacement surgery," says lead author Dr. Daniel Riddle from the Department of Physical Therapy at Virginia Commonwealth University.
Dr. Riddle examined a modified version of an appropriateness classification system developed in Spain and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain and Physical Function scale.
In the study, Riddle and colleagues note that the Spanish criteria are considered by many experts in the field to be "among the most powerful tools for improving quality of care and controlling costs."

The classification systems were used to assess participants enrolled in the Osteoarthritis Initiative - a 5-year study of 4,796 people partly funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Looking at a sub-set of 175 people who underwent TKA surgery, Dr. Riddle's analysis found that 44% of surgeries were classified as "appropriate," 22% were "inconclusive," and 34% were "inappropriate."
The mean age of knee replacement patients in the study was 67 years old, and 60% of them were female.
"Our finding that one third of knee replacements were inappropriate was higher than expected and linked to variation in knee pain [osteoarthritis] severity and functional loss," says Dr. Riddle. "These data highlight the need to develop patient selection criteria in the US."

"I agree with Riddle and colleagues," writes Dr. Jeffery Katz - from the Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA - in a linked editorial.
"We should be concerned about offering total knee replacements to subjects who endorse 'none' or 'mild' on all items of the WOMAC pain and function scales."
The new study also highlights that there are many variables involved in the decision to undergo TKA surgery. Severity of symptoms and the psychological readiness of the patient are two important factors, but in addition to the variables examined in the study, there are a wide range of variables specific to the patient that a surgeon will consider when making the decision for or against TKA surgery.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Patient advocates enlist orthopaedic surgeons' support: AAOS New Orleans

    
Posted by Daniela Nuñez, Consumers Union  FiDA highlight

Since last September, Consumers Union’s Safe Patient Project has been calling on the top hip and knee manufacturers to warranty their products. A warranty would cover revision surgery for patients if their implant is defective –for example, if the implant breaks, fails to adhere to the patient’s body or emits metal particles into tissue or blood. Shockingly, only one hip and knee implant part comes with a warranty, yet more and more patients are getting these implants installed in their bodies.
To help us understand what patients really need, we’ve asked thousands of people with artificial hips and knees to tell us what they expect from a good warranty. Now, we’ve started asking orthopedic surgeons who implant these hip and knee devices what they think about our warranty idea. As experts in their field, we think they’d give us some good input. A surgeon in Florida shared his thoughts on warranties in a guest blog post. Some orthopedic surgeons in Washington state had helpful comments, with several stating an interest in the idea. And a researcher who has analyzed hip and knee implants retrieved from patients over the past 30 years reached out to us with a very useful perspective on the issue.
In our newest effort to get more feedback from surgeons, our Safe Patient Project team will head to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Annual Meeting in New Orleans March 10-14, 2014. We tried to pay the registration fee for us and several patient safety activists, but an AAOS representative told us that this is a “private meeting and not open to those outside the medical field or official exhibitors.” So, we will be outside the meeting and around New Orleans ready to talk to surgeons about why we think hip and knee manufacturers should back their products with a warranty and identifying supporters.
Unfortunately, many patients are left in the dark on how long their hip or knee implant will last — even though most people are given an estimate, there is not a solid guarantee to back that up. Patients also need a clear process to follow if their device fails unexpectedly, something that is routinely offered with warranties. And when a hip or knee implant fails, insurance companies, Medicare and patients are forced to foot the bill while the implant maker doesn’t have to pay a dime. That should change.
Surgeons play an important role in the success of a patient’s hip or knee replacement. We look forward to getting their feedback! And we hope we can enlist their support for warranties.
(If you are an orthopedic surgeon, please email us your thoughts on a warranty at safepatient@consumersunion.org. If you’ll be at the AAOS conference, let us know!)


Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Costs vary wildly for knee replacements! Patients and doctors are in the dark.



Jim Landers

Published: 27 January 2014 09:37 PM
Dallas Morning News

WASHINGTON — I often write about the cost of health care, guided by the perception that Americans pay too much and get too little in return.
On Wednesday, it gets personal.
I am about to have knee replacement surgery at a hospital in Alexandria, Va., just across the Potomac River.
Both knees are shot. I played too much football, had two surgeries for torn cartilage and ran for too many years on unforgiving concrete sidewalks. An orthopedist told me in 2004 that I could keep on running and soon face knee replacements or quit running and postpone the inevitable.
Nine years later, it’s hard to dance or even walk the supermarket aisles with my wife. Running is out of the question. At my last physical, I explained this to Dr. Bilal Desai, my physician. She gave me a referral to an orthopedic group.
“You need total knee replacements — both knees,” said Dr. Daniel Weingold, the surgeon who explained my X-rays to me.
We discussed alternatives — Ibuprofen, weight loss, intense exercise — but none of those would repair the damage. Weingold said he could do the surgery at Inova Alexandria Hospital.

More expensive
Inova owns several hospitals in Northern Virginia, as well as the outpatient clinic where Dr. Desai practices.
I remembered reading that a knee replacement at Inova Alexandria Hospital would cost as much as $5,000 more than at Inova Mount Vernon Hospital, a few miles away.
I asked Weingold. He doubted there could be such a difference between two Inova hospitals. Well, what are the charges, I asked. He did not know. None of the surgeons in his group practices at Mount Vernon, he said, but if I wanted to go there, we could stop now and I could go to another orthopedic group.
I said I wanted to talk with my insurance company.
I emailed BlueCross BlueShield of Texas, which administers our health plan here at The Dallas Morning News. I asked: Do you have any information about which hospital does a better job? What the costs are? Does it make a difference to you if one is cheaper than the other?

High-deductible plan
I was told that both hospitals are in our health plan’s PPO, or preferred provider network, as is Dr. Weingold. Since the hospitals are in Virginia rather than Dallas, I was told, BlueCross Blue-Shield of Texas doesn’t have much information to go on in terms of a recommendation.
Like a lot of people working for Dallas companies, we have a high-deductible health plan designed to make employees better health care shoppers. My deductible is $1,500, and my out-of-pocket maximum is $3,000. I knew I would blow through that, regardless of which hospital I chose.
I’m not eligible for Medicare, but I looked at the Medicare charge information for 3,000-plus hospitals in the country. In 2011, Inova Alexandria Hospital charged $32,051 for a total knee replacement. Inova Mount Vernon Hospital charged $27,549.
I looked at the charges for Dallas hospitals. Medical City Dallas charged $117,616. Baylor University Medical Center charged $43,852. Texas Health Presbyterian charged $58,854.
None of the hospitals in Dallas charged less than $32,938, which was nearly $900 more than the Alexandria hospital.
‘Medicine in America’
I went back to Dr. Desai and told her she’d referred me to an orthopedic practice and hospital where the charges were $5,000 more.
“That’s a lot of money,” she said. “Go to Mount Vernon.”
“But I don’t know a surgeon at Mount Vernon. I went where you referred me,” I said.
“I can write you a blank referral and you can find a surgeon and fill it in,” she suggested.
“Well, why don’t you know about the difference in these hospital charges?” I asked.
“We don’t know about that,” she said. “That’s just medicine in America.”

I’m having the surgery on my right knee at Inova Alexandria. I’ll see how it goes but expect Mount Vernon Hospital will get my left knee.

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Consumer Reports Survey/Study on Hip and Knee Replacement


consumerreports
We're looking for #hip & #knee surgery patients/caregivers for a study. Help us improve #healthcare !!! http://t.co/JU6kWPCa6f
1/14/14 11:22 AM
 (Twitter notice.)


 Go to this link to complete and submit your information and selected participants receive a complimentary ConsumerReports.org subscription!*



(Example Only)  User Questionnaire
Hello,
Thanks for your interest in our Hip & Knee Surgery study. This short questionnaire verifies your eligibility for an upcoming customer interview. The interview will help us better understand your needs in order to incorporate them into a new product we're developing.
Interviews will be held over a Google Hangout or telephone. If you’re interested in participating, please complete the questionnaire below. If you're selected, we’ll be in touch directly to discuss details and set your appointment time.
Details of the study:
- The duration of the interview is 30 minutes
- Participants will receive a complimentary ConsumerReports.org subscription*
To participate you will need to:
- Be at least 18 years old
- Allow us to video or audio record the session
* Please note that you will receive the complimentary subscription only if you are selected as a participant and attend the interview.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Patricia Ju, Shane Shelley, and Chris Baily
Technology Innovation Center
Consumer Reports
 * Required
1.             Availability *Mark ALL time slots for which we could schedule an appointment with you.
         Weekdays Morning
         Weekdays Afternoon
         Weekdays Evening
         Saturdays Morning
         Saturdays Afternoon
         Saturdays Evening
         Other:
2.             


First and last name: *


Best email address to reach you: *


Best phone number to reach you: *


What state do you currently reside in? 



Gender: *
         Male
         Female
         Prefer not to say
3.             


Age: *
         Under 18
         18-21
         22-28
         29-34
         35-44
         45-65
         66-75
         76 Plus
         Prefer not to say
4.             


What experience do you have with Hip or Knee Surgery? *Caregiver is an individual, such as a parent or child, who attends to the needs of a child or dependent adult
         Currently considering Hip or Knee Surgery
         Currently a caregiver for a candidate for Hip or Knee Surgery 
         Recently had Hip or Knee Surgery
         Curious about information on Hip or Knee Surgery






Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Replaced hips/knees: half may not help pain/function.



Joint pain, function not always better after surgery

March 27, 2013 3:43 pm by  | 0 Comments
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Only about half of people who have a knee or hip replaced see meaningful improvements in pain and disability in the months after surgery, a new study from Canada suggests.
Researchers found people who had worse knee or hip pain to begin with, fewer general health problems and no arthritis outside of the replaced joint were more likely to report benefits.
"I think this study really represents the general picture that often people do not have arthritis in just one joint," said Elena Losina, an orthopedic surgery and arthritis researcher from Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.
"It's of course good to set expectations appropriately that if you have three joints affected, doing one procedure is not going to be a miracle," said Losina, who co-wrote a commentary published with the new study.
More than one million people in the U.S. have a knee or hip replaced each year, researchers said - a rate that's expected to continue to grow.
Including hospital fees and the parts themselves, the procedures cost $20,000 to $25,000 and are typically covered by insurance.
Despite the rising popularity of joint replacement, uncertainty remains about which patients have the most to gain and who fares best post-surgery. So a team led by Dr. Gillian Hawker from the University of Toronto tracked about 2,400 older adults with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis in Ontario, Canada, to see who went on to get surgery and how they did.
From the start of the study in 1996 through early 2011, 479 of them had a knee or hip replaced, including 202 who underwent elective surgery and had before and after pain and disability information available for analysis.
Most surgery patients were women with pain in more than one joint, and over 80 percent were overweight or obese.
By a year or two after surgery, the average person had a 10-point improvement in pain and disability from a pre-surgery score of 46.5 out of 100, the research team wrote in Arthritis and Rheumatism.
A nine-point improvement is considered the "minimal important difference" in symptoms, and about 54 percent of joint-replacement patients hit that target.
Unlike general health and other joint problems, people's weight did not predict how they did after a knee or hip replacement, Hawker and her colleagues found.
Losina said that even if a first joint replacement leaves people with some pain and disability, it may help them make incremental steps toward better health.
And doctors may need to realize that until some people get each of their painful joints replaced - not just one knee or hip - they're not going to have optimal outcomes, according to Hawker.
"We have to look at the whole patient, not just a single joint," she told Reuters Health.
Researchers said the new findings provide more evidence for patients and their doctors to use while discussing the pros and cons of knee and hip replacement.
"This is not an easy surgery, it's an expensive surgery, and I think people should understand what they are getting into and what are the expected outcomes," Losina told Reuters Health.
Andrew Judge, who has studied joint replacement outcomes at the University of Oxford in the UK, agreed these kinds of findings are important to help inform doctor-patient decision making.
"Further research is required in other large datasets in order to confirm these findings, and to identify other key determinants of good outcomes, to inform the development of a future clinical risk prediction tool," he told Reuters Health in an email.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/WVTTfx Arthritis and Rheumatism, online March 4, 2013.

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Generic Orthopedic Implants?


'Generic' medical devices could cut into name-brand profits
       By David Sell  The PhiladelphiaInquirer
       July 23, 2012 - 3:11 pm EDT 
(FiDA bold)
      

PHILADELPHIA — Generic competition — a billion-dollar problem for brand-name drug companies since the 1980s — is making inroads in the orthopedic medical devices industry. Last week Cardinal Health Inc., one of the three biggest device wholesalers, said it was increasing its offering of lower-cost products for broken bones.
This nascent trend, borne of increasing pressure to control health care costs, represents a direct threat to brand-name device makers such as West Chester, Pa.-based Synthes, which was bought in June by Johnson & Johnson for $19.7 billion.
Cardinal Health, 21st on the Fortune 500 list, is based in Dublin, Ohio. In announcing its so-called “Orthopedic Solutions” option for hospitals and surgery centers, Cardinal said it could supply some products at 30 to 50 percent savings.
Based upon our market and customer research, we believe that U.S. health care providers are ready to support a simpler, more transparent, fair priced orthopedic business model,” Cardinal Health executive Lisa Ashby said in a statement.
Cardinal Health entered a partnership with Emerge Medical, a Denver-based company that makes surgical screws, drill bits and guide wires. Emerge CEO John Marotta is a former Synthes sale representative. Synthes was sufficiently annoyed with his efforts that it sued him in 2011. He has countersued, and a trial is pending.
“Together we will provide a low-cost trauma solution that will drive simplicity and transparency to this pressured health care environment,” Marotta said of the Cardinal Health partnership.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not use the term “generic” devices, as it does with drugs, but there is an approval process. Like drugs, medical devices have patents, and the disputes employ numerous lawyers.
Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky said last week that medical devices are a $40 billion market worldwide. But Johnson & Johnson, like other device makers is being pressed to lower prices or at least slow the rate of growth.
Trade publication Orthopedic Network News reported that list prices for hip and knee implants increased 4.2 percent between 2011 and 2012 — the lowest increase in the 19 years it has surveyed device manufacturers and the fourth straight decline in the growth rate.
Laura Ruth, director of the health care practice for research and consulting firm Fuld & Co., said the generic device market is still “fragmented,” but pointed to a January report by the Government Accountability Office as an example of greater scrutiny of the cost and acquisition process of hospitals, whose bill are often transferred to taxpayers. Hospitals often buy through group purchasing organizations, which have been criticized for being too cozy with manufacturers and too secretive with hospitals.
The title of the GAO report was: “Lack of Price Transparency May Hamper Hospitals’ Ability to Be Prudent Purchasers of Implantable Medical Devices.”
Because of those forces, Ruth said, “there should be a greater opportunity for lower-cost devices.”