Joint replacements are the #1 expenditure of Medicare. The process of approving these medical devices is flawed according to the Institute of Medicine. It is time for patients' voices to be heard as stakeholders and for public support for increased medical device industry accountability and heightened protections for patients. Post-market registry. Product warranty. Patient/consumer stakeholder equity. Rescind industry pre-emptions/entitlements. All clinical trials must report all data.
Please share what you have learned!
Twitter: @JjrkCh

Thursday, September 7, 2017

Please sign and share this petition! Thank you!

The Medical Device Safety Act H.R. 2164
440 Messages Sent So Far
The Medical Device Safety Act 2017 H.R. 2164 #MDSA17

The Medical Device Safety Act of 2017 was introduced in the house on April 26, 2017 by Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick. It is a bi-partisan bill currently co-sponsored by Rosa DeLauro, Louise Slaughter, and Jan Schakowsky. The bill would amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting all Class III devices. Including, but not limited to, essure, nerve stimulators, hip implants, defibrillators, pacemakers, infusion pumps, surgical mesh, cochlear implants, and breast implants.

There are over 157 Class III medical devices on the market in the USA. Class III medical devices currently fall under federal preemption protection. This is due to the Riegel vs Medtronic supreme court ruling in 2008, when a United States Supreme Court case held that the preemption clause of the Medical Device Amendment bars state common-law claims that challenge the effectiveness or safety of a medical device marketed in a form that received premarket approval from the Food and Drug Administration.

What does this mean? It means that patients who are harmed by Class III medical devices have a very difficult, if not impossible, time pursuing litigation if injured, disabled, or killed by a Class III medical device. The manufacturers are, in essence, protected. Most Class III cases get thrown out on the grounds of Federal Preemption.

The purpose of this bill is to restore a patient’s right to litigation should he/she be harmed by a Class III medical device. Even decades after the FDA’s pre market approval of a Class III device, if it is proven to be ineffective or proven to cause harm, individuals still cannot hold the manufacturer liable for injury, even in the case of a recall.

We are asking for your support of The Medical Device Safety Act 2017, H.R.2164, as our representatives. Please consider co sponsoring in the House, or introducing/sponsoring in the Senate! We are tens of thousands of consumers who have been harmed by, disabled by, or lost a loved one to a Class III medical device. We all deserve the same rights as consumers. Help restore our rights by supporting this bill! Thank you.


No comments:

Post a Comment