Guarantee that knee, fix that hip!
The most important (and expensive) product you may ever
buy doesn't come with a warranty. It's time we change that.
Medical device manufacturers are making billions by
selling knee and hip implants to Americans who want to feel better and play
longer. But when these devices fail, patients – as well as
taxpayers – are faced with costly bills to replace them.
Manufacturers claim implants are safe and of high quality.
If that's true, why aren't all the major companies (only Biomet warranties one
of its knee products) backing up these implants when they fail?
Consumers Union has sent the top six hip and knee makers details of
what should be in a strong 20-year warranty, and asked them to comply. Sendyour own message now, and let's make sure manufacturers – notpatients – are on the hook when products fail!
Artificial
hips and knees need a lemon law, says Consumer Reports
By Joel Keehn FiDA
highlight
Published September 10, 2013
Consumer Reports On Twitter: @ConsumersUnion and @CUsafepatient
Imagine if you had to take a new car back to the dealer
to get a defective part fixed and you, not the manufacturer, had to pay for the
work. Well, that’s the situation with artificial knees and hips.
Nearly 20 percent
of the hip replacements done each year and 10 percent of the knee replacements
are revisions, often done because the original device was defective. Those
follow-up surgeries tend to require longer hospital stays than the initial
procedures, pose additional risks, and have a higher price tag, too. Yet their
costs are passed onto consumers or their insurance companies, including
Medicare.
That’s one of the reasons Consumers Union, the policy
arm of Consumer Reports, says manufacturers of hip and knee implants should give
patients warranties,
guaranteeing to replace defective devices at no cost. That, they say, is
not only fairer to patients, but might encourage companies to make their
devices safer and more durable.
“While patients may be told by their surgeon how long a
device can be expected to last, they rarely get a guarantee in writing since
most hip and knee implants do not come with a warranty,” said Lisa McGiffert,
director of Consumers Union’s Safe Patient Project.
The SafePatientProject
recently gathered information from the Food and Drug Administration on hip and
knee implant recalls over the past 10 years, and found that all major
manufacturers had recalled a product or line of products. And some of those
recalls involved products that posed real risks.
See our surgery Ratings for hip and knee
replacement as well as our advice on
smarter hip and knee repair. Our hospital Ratings
offer detailed information on more than 4,000 hospitals nationwide.
For example,
since 2003 about 750,000 Americans received metal-on-metal hips, which were
supposed to last longer than devices made with ceramic and plastic. Not only
were such hips more likely to fail, but also some patients experienced
debilitating symptoms from metal debris that flakes off the device over time,
including heart damage and neurological problems.
Knee implants have not failed as often or as
dangerously, but the Safe Patient analysis found that hundreds of knee-implant
components have been recalled since 2003, often because they were shipped with
the wrong part, a wrong size part, a missing part, or a part built for the left
side etched as a right, or vice versa.
As our earlier report on dangerous
medical devices found, most hip and knee implants are allowed on the
market without being reviewed for safety and effectiveness by the FDA. Instead,
under current law, the companies simply have to demonstrate that the devices
are “substantially equivalent” to a product already being sold. Since most new
hip and knee implants are similar to ones already on the market, manufacturers
can gain approval through the FDA’s fast track 510(k) clearance process without
having to prove the device is safe and effective.
“Medical device companies claim that current law
provides adequate protection for patients and that their implants are
dependable and safe,” said McGiffert. “If that’s the case, they should have no
objection to offering warranties to back up those claims. Patients and taxpayers shouldn’t
be on the hook for the cost of replacing devices when they fail.”
The Safe Patient has urged the makers of hip and knee
implants, including Biomet, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Smith & Nephew, Stryker
Corporation, Wright Medical Technology, Inc., and Zimmer Holdings Inc., to
provide a 20-year warranty that:
covers the full cost of the revision surgery,
including the device itself, the surgeon and hospital costs, and patient
out-of-pocket costs;
establishes a clear system for patients to use,
including a toll-free phone line and a registration number to track the claims
process, with physicians charging the device company, not the patient; and
does not eliminate the patient’s right to sue
if he or she uses a warranty.
Patrick.Conway@cms.hhs.gov (Chief Medical Officer)
shari.ling@cms.hhs.gov (Deputy Chief Medical Director)
Lead purchasing decision-makers in the U.S. who need to know from each of you that implanted medical devices are poorly vetted globally, they harm people permanently, the harm is preventable and patients are not given informed consent.
No comments:
Post a Comment