Dallas Morning News - Danielle Ofri
Published: 07 June 2013 08:07 PM
Updated: 07 June 2013 08:09 PM
It was probably our eighth or ninth admission that
day, but my intern and I had given up counting. I was midway through my medical
residency, already a master of efficiency. You had to be, or you’d never keep
up. This one was a classic eye-roller: a nursing home patient with dementia,
sent to the emergency room for an altered mental status. When you were juggling
patients with acute heart failure and rampant infections, it was hard to get
worked up over a demented nonagenarian who was looking a little more demented.
The trick to surviving was to shuttle patients to another area of the
hospital as quickly as possible. This patient was a perfect candidate
for the intermediate care unit, a holding station for patients with no active
medical issues who were awaiting discharge. First we just had to rule out any
treatable medical conditions — get the labs, head CT scan and chest X-ray. But
the docs at the intermediate ward left at 5 p.m., and it was 4:45. I quickly
scanned through the labs, called the ward’s doctor and ran through the case —
demented patient, still demented, return to nursing home tomorrow.
I remember the doctor’s voice so clearly: “You’re
sure the labs and everything are normal?” Yes, yes, I said, everything is fine.
She hesitated, then said OK. The intern and I high-fived each other and bolted
back to our other admissions.
The next afternoon the doctor tracked me down.
Without mincing words, she told me that she’d been called overnight by the
radiologist; the patient’s head CT showed an intracranial bleed. The patient
was now with the neurosurgeons, getting the blood drained from inside her
skull.
My body turned to stone. An intracranial bleed? You
couldn’t do much worse than miss an intracranial bleed.
How had I let my craze to decrease my patient load
overtake proper medical care? I had failed to check the head CT! I was appalled
at myself, mortified by my negligence. I stumbled through the rest of the day,
an acrid mix of shame and guilt churning inside me.
I never told
anyone about my lapse — not my intern, not my attending physician, certainly
not the patient’s family. I tried to rationalize it: The
radiologist had caught the bleeding, and no additional harm had come to the
patient.
But what if I had discharged the patient? What if I
had started her on a medication like aspirin that could have worsened the
bleeding? My error could easily have led to a fatal outcome. The patient was
simply lucky.
In hospital
lingo, this was a near miss. But a near miss is still an error, just one in
which backup systems, oversight or sheer luck prevent harm.
A near miss,
like any error, is an opportunity to examine how mistakes are made and what
changes might prevent them. Yet we have no idea how many near misses there are.
Many experts feel that near-miss errors dwarf the number of known errors, a
number that is already too high for comfort. (According to a 2006 report,
medication errors alone injure an estimated 1.5 million patients a year.)
The instinct
for most medical professionals is to keep these shameful mistakes to ourselves.
For the past two years, I’ve been interviewing doctors about the emotional
experiences that have molded them. Though I was interested in the full range of
emotions, nearly every single one brought up a medical error that they had been
party to during their careers; many of them had never spoken about it before.
The shame of their errors — including the near misses — was potent, even
decades later.
Much attention has been paid to reducing medical
errors. Electronic prescriptions avoid penmanship mistakes. Bar codes on
wristbands ensure that medications go to the right patient. Checklists and
timeouts before surgeries help prevent common oversights. But we can stop only
the errors we know about. There
remains a black hole of near misses, of uncharted errors — a black hole
of shame that prevents caregivers from coming forward.
Medical culture is less overtly punitive than it
used to be, but the guilt and blame are internalized, often savagely, by its
practitioners. How can we ease the shame and help doctors and nurses come
forward with their near misses?
This is not the type of thing we can orchestrate
with a quality-improvement initiative and a zippy slogan. It has to come from
inside the medical world, and it helps to start at the top.
When the
chief of medicine or the director of nursing stands up and talks about his or
her biggest medical error, it will get noticed by the rank and file. Hearing
how a person in authority handled the emotional fallout and the feelings of
incompetence may give others the courage to come forward. Until we attend to
the culture of shame that surrounds medical error, we will be only nipping at
the edges of one of the greatest threats to our patients’ health.
Danielle Ofri, an associate professor at New York University School of
Medicine, is the editor of the Bellevue Literary Review and the author of “What
Doctors Feel: How Emotions Affect the Practice of Medicine.” Follow her on
Twitter at @danielleofri.
No comments:
Post a Comment